Note

This site currently contains data for only the last 2 elections and may have some issues as we are still updating it. More election data will be added in the coming weeks.

ELECTION 2026 • BOOTH LEVEL DATA

Polling Stations in PANRUTI

& 2026 Booth Results

Explore deep analytics for PANRUTI constituency. Booth-level vote share, turnout trends, and candidate dominance mapped across 310 polling stations.

310Stations
2.1LTotal Votes
10Candidates

Constituency Booth Summary

Total Polling Stations

310

Metric

Highest Turnout Booth

PS POSTAL

Metric

Lowest Turnout Booth

PS 7

Metric

Closest Contest Booth

PS 54

Metric

Highest Margin Booth

PS 16

Metric

Highest NOTA Booth

PS POSTAL

Metric

Constituency Booth Insights

Booth Intelligence

AI Trend Active

  • 0 polling stations identified as strongholds.

  • Closest contest observed in PS 54 with a margin of 1 votes.

  • Highest turnout recorded at PS POSTAL (0.0%).

  • NOTA crossed 2% in 0 booths.

* Granular trend synthesis

TURN-OUTMARGINSTRONGHOLD

Compare Candidates

Toggle to cross-analyze performance

10 Active

Dominance Analytics

Granular candidate performance across all polling stations

Granular Booth Analytics

The following comprehensive polling station dataset provides micro-level insights into Election 2026 voter behavior. Analyze booth-level vote share, turnout volatility, and candidate performance with advanced sorting and search capabilities.

310 Stations Found
Swipe to view candidate share
MOHAN. K
ABDUR RAHMAN. A.R
MANIKANDAN. M
BANUPRIYA. M
SURENDAR. R
None Of The Above
RAMALINGAM. A
SRIKANTHU. S
MOHAMMED SAFI. A
PRAKASH. R
Classification
POSTAL2,882
0.0%
+80.3%
38.5%1,013
Won
34.9%919
21.5%567
3.8%101
0.7%19
0.3%8
0.1%3
0.1%2
0.0%1
0.0%1
Normal
1688
88.3%
+00.0%
49.4%340
Won
21.4%147
23.4%161
3.9%27
0.7%5
0.7%5
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.3%2
0.0%0
High Turnout
2783
87.8%
+00.0%
22.2%174
49.5%388
Won
23.2%182
2.5%20
1.3%10
0.5%4
0.1%1
0.3%2
0.1%1
0.1%1
High Turnout
3658
90.5%
+00.0%
55.2%363
Won
17.0%112
23.7%156
2.0%13
0.9%6
0.3%2
0.0%0
0.3%2
0.3%2
0.3%2
High Turnout
4837
90.8%
+00.0%
60.2%504
Won
15.7%131
20.7%173
1.6%13
1.1%9
0.4%3
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.1%1
0.2%2
High Turnout
5508
88.2%
+00.0%
62.6%318
Won
12.6%64
22.8%116
1.2%6
0.2%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.2%1
0.4%2
0.0%0
High Turnout
6511
88.1%
+00.0%
71.4%365
Won
9.2%47
16.8%86
1.6%8
0.6%3
0.4%2
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
7367
92.0%
+00.0%
42.8%157
Won
30.8%113
22.6%83
1.6%6
0.8%3
0.5%2
0.3%1
0.3%1
0.3%1
0.0%0
High Turnout
8671
90.8%
+00.0%
37.1%249
Won
30.4%204
27.4%184
2.5%17
0.1%1
1.5%10
0.1%1
0.1%1
0.5%3
0.1%1
High Turnout
9661
93.0%
+00.0%
15.1%100
55.7%368
Won
26.9%178
1.4%9
0.1%1
0.5%3
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.3%2
High Turnout
10574
92.4%
+00.0%
17.8%102
56.6%325
Won
22.8%131
1.4%8
0.2%1
0.7%4
0.2%1
0.2%1
0.2%1
0.0%0
High Turnout
11953
89.0%
+00.0%
58.7%559
Won
23.4%223
13.5%129
2.8%27
0.8%8
0.3%3
0.1%1
0.1%1
0.2%2
0.0%0
High Turnout
12662
94.8%
+00.0%
28.1%186
46.1%305
Won
23.7%157
0.6%4
0.5%3
0.3%2
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.3%2
0.3%2
High Turnout
13918
88.5%
+00.0%
59.0%542
Won
17.0%156
21.0%193
1.9%17
0.1%1
0.4%4
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.3%3
0.1%1
High Turnout
14510
91.1%
+00.0%
58.8%300
Won
14.9%76
21.8%111
2.8%14
0.4%2
0.6%3
0.6%3
0.2%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
15645
88.4%
+00.0%
32.3%208
32.9%212
Won
31.8%205
1.4%9
0.5%3
0.2%1
0.0%0
0.5%3
0.0%0
0.6%4
High Turnout
161,131
95.0%
+00.0%
63.3%716
Won
14.4%163
18.2%206
2.6%29
0.5%6
0.3%3
0.1%1
0.3%4
0.1%1
0.2%2
High Turnout
17669
86.4%
+00.0%
60.4%404
Won
12.7%85
23.9%160
1.6%11
0.6%4
0.3%2
0.0%0
0.3%2
0.1%1
0.0%0
High Turnout
18542
84.8%
+00.0%
55.7%302
Won
14.0%76
27.5%149
1.5%8
0.2%1
0.6%3
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.4%2
0.2%1
High Turnout
19935
89.3%
+00.0%
45.5%425
Won
25.8%241
22.5%210
4.9%46
0.3%3
0.4%4
0.1%1
0.3%3
0.1%1
0.1%1
High Turnout
20700
85.6%
+00.0%
47.1%330
Won
32.4%227
17.3%121
2.1%15
0.1%1
0.3%2
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.3%2
0.3%2
High Turnout
21659
90.3%
+00.0%
37.2%245
46.9%309
Won
14.1%93
0.9%6
0.0%0
0.3%2
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.3%2
0.1%1
High Turnout
22960
85.9%
+00.0%
51.1%491
Won
23.1%222
21.9%210
2.9%28
0.4%4
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.3%3
0.1%1
High Turnout
23828
87.9%
+00.0%
53.1%440
Won
26.4%219
17.6%146
1.4%12
0.4%3
0.2%2
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.5%4
0.1%1
High Turnout
24891
85.3%
+00.0%
67.8%604
Won
11.6%103
16.4%146
2.6%23
0.1%1
0.6%5
0.1%1
0.3%3
0.5%4
0.1%1
High Turnout
25831
93.4%
+00.0%
57.2%475
Won
25.5%212
14.9%124
1.3%11
0.0%0
0.6%5
0.0%0
0.2%2
0.2%2
0.0%0
High Turnout
26648
93.8%
+00.0%
48.9%317
Won
25.9%168
21.4%139
1.9%12
0.0%0
0.9%6
0.0%0
0.3%2
0.5%3
0.1%1
High Turnout
27800
87.3%
+00.0%
30.8%246
29.6%237
34.8%278
Won
3.5%28
0.0%0
0.8%6
0.1%1
0.1%1
0.1%1
0.3%2
High Turnout
28603
84.6%
+00.0%
53.4%322
Won
13.1%79
31.3%189
1.5%9
0.2%1
0.2%1
0.0%0
0.2%1
0.2%1
0.0%0
High Turnout
29688
87.4%
+00.0%
31.8%219
34.2%235
Won
28.1%193
3.0%21
0.7%5
1.0%7
0.0%0
0.6%4
0.3%2
0.3%2
High Turnout
30658
89.2%
+00.0%
58.8%387
Won
15.2%100
22.6%149
2.1%14
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.6%4
0.1%1
0.3%2
High Turnout
31887
88.1%
+00.0%
25.4%225
34.5%306
34.8%309
Won
4.0%35
0.2%2
0.6%5
0.2%2
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.2%2
High Turnout
32809
88.4%
+00.0%
10.0%81
50.7%410
Won
34.7%281
2.6%21
0.7%6
0.5%4
0.1%1
0.1%1
0.3%2
0.3%2
High Turnout
33775
91.4%
+00.0%
33.8%262
28.3%219
34.5%267
Won
1.7%13
0.5%4
0.5%4
0.0%0
0.5%4
0.1%1
0.1%1
High Turnout
34741
91.0%
+00.0%
71.8%532
Won
5.8%43
19.4%144
1.2%9
0.1%1
0.3%2
0.0%0
0.8%6
0.3%2
0.3%2
High Turnout
35628
83.5%
+00.0%
67.7%425
Won
12.1%76
17.7%111
1.4%9
0.0%0
0.5%3
0.2%1
0.2%1
0.2%1
0.2%1
High Turnout
36872
93.3%
+00.0%
32.9%287
44.1%385
Won
21.7%189
0.9%8
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.1%1
High Turnout
371,020
91.3%
+00.0%
33.0%337
50.0%510
Won
13.5%138
1.5%15
0.4%4
0.6%6
0.1%1
0.2%2
0.3%3
0.4%4
High Turnout
38566
87.9%
+00.0%
49.8%282
Won
30.0%170
17.1%97
2.1%12
0.3%2
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.2%1
0.2%1
0.2%1
High Turnout
39548
86.7%
+00.0%
66.8%366
Won
15.2%83
13.3%73
2.7%15
1.3%7
0.4%2
0.0%0
0.2%1
0.2%1
0.0%0
High Turnout
40483
79.3%
+00.0%
55.9%270
Won
21.1%102
20.3%98
2.3%11
0.2%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.2%1
High Turnout
41814
93.9%
+00.0%
18.4%150
36.9%300
39.9%325
Won
2.3%19
0.3%2
0.3%2
0.3%2
0.5%4
0.6%5
0.6%5
High Turnout
42749
89.3%
+00.0%
39.6%297
Won
31.6%237
25.5%191
2.0%15
0.3%2
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.1%1
0.3%2
0.4%3
High Turnout
43489
87.6%
+00.0%
65.6%321
Won
14.9%73
15.1%74
2.0%10
1.2%6
0.6%3
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.2%1
0.2%1
High Turnout
44546
90.2%
+00.0%
68.1%372
Won
11.5%63
17.9%98
1.5%8
0.4%2
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.6%3
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
45776
87.4%
+00.0%
6.2%48
60.4%469
Won
30.9%240
1.0%8
0.3%2
0.6%5
0.1%1
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.3%2
High Turnout
46490
93.2%
+00.0%
11.4%56
60.2%295
Won
25.9%127
1.4%7
0.0%0
0.6%3
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.4%2
High Turnout
47500
87.1%
+00.0%
53.0%265
Won
17.8%89
26.6%133
1.4%7
0.0%0
0.6%3
0.2%1
0.2%1
0.0%0
0.2%1
High Turnout
48925
85.6%
+00.0%
45.3%419
Won
23.6%218
26.6%246
3.6%33
0.3%3
0.3%3
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.2%2
High Turnout
49550
83.2%
+00.0%
18.2%100
40.7%224
Won
38.7%213
2.0%11
0.2%1
0.2%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
Navigation Feed
Segment 1 / 7

PANRUTI Booth-Level Results: FAQ

What is the significance of polling station wise results for PANRUTI?

Polling station wise results for PANRUTI provide granular, booth-level data on voter behavior. This allows analysts to identify specific geographic pockets of support and understand how different demographics within the constituency voted in the 2026 election.

How can I identify candidate strongholds in this constituency?

Strongholds are identified as polling stations where a candidate significantly outperformed their average vote share. Our 'Booth Dominance' analytics section highlights these 'Fortress' booths where a single candidate has commanded over 50% or 60% of the total votes.

What does high turnout in a specific polling station indicate?

High voter turnout often indicates strong political mobilization or highly competitive local dynamics. In our table, you can sort polling stations by 'Turnout %' to see which booths had the most active participation in the election.

How is booth-level vote share calculated?

The vote share for each candidate at a polling station is calculated by dividing the total votes they received by the total valid votes polled in that specific booth, expressed as a percentage.

Why is analyzing winning margins at the booth level important?

Analyzing margins at the booth level helps in understanding the intensity of the contest. It shows where the competition was neck-and-neck (Swing Booths) versus where one candidate won by a large, comfortable margin, providing insights into voter consolidation.