Note

This site currently contains data for only the last 2 elections and may have some issues as we are still updating it. More election data will be added in the coming weeks.

ELECTION 2026 • BOOTH LEVEL DATA

Polling Stations in CUDDALORE

& 2026 Booth Results

Explore deep analytics for CUDDALORE constituency. Booth-level vote share, turnout trends, and candidate dominance mapped across 259 polling stations.

259Stations
1.9LTotal Votes
16Candidates

Constituency Booth Summary

Total Polling Stations

259

Metric

Highest Turnout Booth

PS POSTAL

Metric

Lowest Turnout Booth

PS 256

Metric

Closest Contest Booth

PS 70

Metric

Highest Margin Booth

PS 147

Metric

Highest NOTA Booth

PS POSTAL

Metric

Constituency Booth Insights

Booth Intelligence

AI Trend Active

  • 0 polling stations identified as strongholds.

  • Closest contest observed in PS 70 with a margin of 1 votes.

  • Highest turnout recorded at PS POSTAL (0.0%).

  • NOTA crossed 2% in 0 booths.

* Granular trend synthesis

TURN-OUTMARGINSTRONGHOLD

Compare Candidates

Toggle to cross-analyze performance

16 Active

Dominance Analytics

Granular candidate performance across all polling stations

Granular Booth Analytics

The following comprehensive polling station dataset provides micro-level insights into Election 2026 voter behavior. Analyze booth-level vote share, turnout volatility, and candidate performance with advanced sorting and search capabilities.

259 Stations Found
Swipe to view candidate share
A.S.CHANDARASEKARAN
M.C.SAMPATH
B.RAJKUMAR
S.SARASU
None Of The Above
K.LENIN
S. RAMASAMY
P.NAGASUNDARAM
R.RAMACHANDRAN
E.GURUBARAN
R. VEERAMANI
P.NATARAJAN
R.MAYAVAN
E.FAROOK ALI
S.RAJAMOHAN
V. SUGANTHI
Classification
POSTAL3,822
0.0%
+290.8%
36.0%1,274
Won
30.5%1,082
28.5%1,009
3.3%117
0.8%29
0.2%8
0.2%8
0.2%7
0.1%4
0.1%2
0.1%2
0.0%1
0.0%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
Normal
1898
91.0%
+00.0%
23.1%207
44.4%399
Won
28.5%256
3.1%28
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.1%1
0.1%1
0.2%2
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.0%0
High Turnout
2768
94.5%
+00.0%
46.5%357
Won
14.7%113
35.4%272
1.3%10
0.5%4
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.3%2
0.5%4
0.0%0
0.5%4
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
3960
88.8%
+00.0%
16.9%162
45.2%434
Won
33.5%322
3.2%31
0.1%1
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.3%3
0.2%2
0.0%0
0.2%2
0.3%3
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
4712
95.6%
+00.0%
17.3%123
45.2%322
Won
32.0%228
3.4%24
0.3%2
0.3%2
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.4%3
0.1%1
0.7%5
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
5949
90.6%
+00.0%
22.0%209
50.0%475
Won
25.2%239
1.9%18
0.2%2
0.0%0
0.4%4
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.1%1
High Turnout
6777
90.8%
+00.0%
40.8%317
Won
29.9%232
25.6%199
2.1%16
0.8%6
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.4%3
0.3%2
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
7677
93.9%
+00.0%
22.2%150
43.4%294
Won
30.9%209
2.7%18
0.1%1
0.3%2
0.1%1
0.1%1
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
8935
91.8%
+00.0%
30.7%287
23.3%218
41.4%387
Won
2.4%22
0.5%5
0.1%1
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.9%8
0.2%2
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.2%2
0.1%1
0.0%0
High Turnout
91,044
94.5%
+00.0%
25.6%267
34.9%364
35.9%375
Won
1.9%20
0.2%2
0.6%6
0.2%2
0.1%1
0.2%2
0.1%1
0.2%2
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.1%1
High Turnout
10845
91.3%
+00.0%
32.4%274
24.7%209
35.5%300
Won
6.0%51
0.4%3
0.0%0
0.2%2
0.2%2
0.2%2
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.2%2
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
11901
93.0%
+00.0%
39.4%355
Won
21.2%191
34.7%313
3.7%33
0.2%2
0.1%1
0.4%4
0.2%2
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
121,129
94.1%
+00.0%
28.9%326
35.4%400
Won
33.3%376
1.3%15
0.3%3
0.1%1
0.2%2
0.1%1
0.2%2
0.2%2
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
13484
95.1%
+00.0%
39.5%191
Won
21.3%103
34.3%166
2.7%13
1.0%5
0.2%1
0.8%4
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.2%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
14476
94.4%
+00.0%
22.5%107
47.5%226
Won
27.9%133
1.3%6
0.0%0
0.2%1
0.0%0
0.2%1
0.2%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.2%1
High Turnout
15709
95.9%
+00.0%
34.6%245
35.8%254
Won
26.4%187
2.4%17
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.3%2
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
16477
94.8%
+00.0%
21.8%104
49.3%235
Won
25.8%123
1.3%6
1.1%5
0.2%1
0.2%1
0.0%0
0.2%1
0.0%0
0.2%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
17360
96.3%
+00.0%
20.8%75
46.9%169
Won
28.1%101
1.7%6
0.8%3
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.3%1
0.0%0
1.1%4
0.0%0
0.3%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
18290
95.4%
+00.0%
24.1%70
42.1%122
Won
30.3%88
1.7%5
0.7%2
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.3%1
0.3%1
0.0%0
0.3%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
19521
97.0%
+00.0%
26.1%136
42.0%219
Won
30.1%157
1.1%6
0.2%1
0.0%0
0.2%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
20879
80.0%
+00.0%
46.6%410
Won
19.6%172
28.8%253
2.4%21
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.3%3
0.1%1
0.5%4
0.0%0
1.1%10
0.2%2
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.1%1
High Turnout
21341
85.9%
+00.0%
24.1%82
16.1%55
56.0%191
Won
2.6%9
0.3%1
0.0%0
0.6%2
0.3%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
22602
92.5%
+00.0%
27.7%167
34.4%207
Won
32.6%196
4.0%24
0.3%2
0.3%2
0.0%0
0.2%1
0.2%1
0.0%0
0.3%2
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
23892
92.1%
+00.0%
44.5%397
Won
10.8%96
41.1%367
1.8%16
0.6%5
0.2%2
0.1%1
0.2%2
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.3%3
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
24721
86.9%
+00.0%
29.0%209
27.3%197
39.3%283
Won
3.3%24
0.6%4
0.3%2
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.3%2
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
25681
95.9%
+00.0%
34.5%235
37.4%255
Won
24.5%167
2.2%15
0.4%3
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.3%2
0.1%1
0.0%0
High Turnout
26703
95.5%
+00.0%
29.4%207
33.9%238
Won
32.9%231
2.6%18
0.4%3
0.1%1
0.3%2
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
27436
93.8%
+00.0%
32.6%142
40.1%175
Won
22.3%97
3.9%17
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.5%2
0.0%0
0.5%2
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.2%1
0.0%0
High Turnout
28801
95.4%
+00.0%
41.7%334
Won
25.8%207
30.2%242
1.1%9
0.3%2
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.4%3
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.3%2
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
29877
95.0%
+00.0%
36.0%316
Won
31.9%280
29.3%257
1.6%14
0.5%4
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.3%3
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
30813
94.9%
+00.0%
38.8%315
Won
26.7%217
28.8%234
3.1%25
0.9%7
0.3%2
0.1%1
0.4%3
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.6%5
0.3%2
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.1%1
High Turnout
311,012
93.7%
+00.0%
22.0%223
45.3%458
Won
28.7%290
2.7%27
0.5%5
0.1%1
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.4%4
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.2%2
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
32850
93.6%
+00.0%
24.6%209
44.6%379
Won
24.4%207
2.6%22
0.8%7
0.1%1
0.0%0
2.1%18
0.1%1
0.1%1
0.5%4
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
33615
91.9%
+00.0%
28.0%172
39.0%240
Won
29.3%180
2.6%16
0.2%1
0.2%1
0.5%3
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.2%1
0.2%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
34600
93.5%
+00.0%
33.0%198
Won
27.0%162
31.2%187
1.0%6
1.0%6
0.2%1
6.0%36
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.3%2
0.0%0
0.2%1
0.2%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
35967
92.0%
+00.0%
33.4%323
19.2%186
34.4%333
Won
1.2%12
0.7%7
0.2%2
9.7%94
0.2%2
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.2%2
0.1%1
0.2%2
0.3%3
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
36823
95.1%
+00.0%
45.7%376
Won
40.8%336
11.9%98
0.5%4
0.2%2
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.1%1
0.4%3
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
37848
94.9%
+00.0%
24.9%211
43.4%368
Won
28.2%239
2.0%17
0.1%1
0.1%1
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.6%5
0.2%2
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.1%1
High Turnout
381,139
93.9%
+00.0%
37.6%428
Won
36.0%410
22.3%254
2.7%31
0.4%5
0.3%4
0.0%0
0.3%3
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.2%2
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.0%0
High Turnout
39846
94.5%
+00.0%
37.9%321
Won
37.0%313
22.9%194
1.1%9
0.3%3
0.3%3
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.2%2
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
40462
92.2%
+00.0%
38.3%177
Won
30.5%141
27.9%129
1.7%8
0.0%0
0.2%1
0.2%1
0.0%0
0.4%2
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.2%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.2%1
High Turnout
41557
92.8%
+00.0%
22.6%126
46.9%261
Won
26.2%146
3.0%17
0.4%2
0.5%3
0.0%0
0.2%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.2%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
42762
95.1%
+00.0%
55.3%421
Won
15.1%115
25.6%195
1.8%14
1.2%9
0.1%1
0.1%1
0.4%3
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.0%0
High Turnout
43739
89.9%
+00.0%
30.0%222
37.2%275
Won
29.0%214
1.9%14
0.7%5
0.1%1
0.3%2
0.5%4
0.1%1
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
44608
91.6%
+00.0%
19.4%118
45.7%278
Won
31.3%190
2.3%14
0.2%1
0.5%3
0.0%0
0.2%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.3%2
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.2%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
45912
95.2%
+00.0%
56.1%512
Won
12.9%118
28.5%260
1.1%10
0.6%5
0.1%1
0.1%1
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.2%2
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
46676
85.4%
+00.0%
22.5%152
39.5%267
Won
34.3%232
3.0%20
0.0%0
0.3%2
0.0%0
0.3%2
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
47862
89.0%
+00.0%
37.5%323
Won
27.7%239
30.4%262
3.6%31
0.5%4
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
High Turnout
48690
89.8%
+00.0%
50.0%345
Won
18.1%125
27.0%186
3.3%23
0.6%4
0.1%1
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.3%2
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.1%1
High Turnout
49869
89.6%
+00.0%
20.3%176
46.4%403
Won
29.2%254
3.2%28
0.2%2
0.1%1
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.2%2
0.1%1
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.0%0
0.1%1
High Turnout
Navigation Feed
Segment 1 / 6

CUDDALORE Booth-Level Results: FAQ

What is the significance of polling station wise results for CUDDALORE?

Polling station wise results for CUDDALORE provide granular, booth-level data on voter behavior. This allows analysts to identify specific geographic pockets of support and understand how different demographics within the constituency voted in the 2026 election.

How can I identify candidate strongholds in this constituency?

Strongholds are identified as polling stations where a candidate significantly outperformed their average vote share. Our 'Booth Dominance' analytics section highlights these 'Fortress' booths where a single candidate has commanded over 50% or 60% of the total votes.

What does high turnout in a specific polling station indicate?

High voter turnout often indicates strong political mobilization or highly competitive local dynamics. In our table, you can sort polling stations by 'Turnout %' to see which booths had the most active participation in the election.

How is booth-level vote share calculated?

The vote share for each candidate at a polling station is calculated by dividing the total votes they received by the total valid votes polled in that specific booth, expressed as a percentage.

Why is analyzing winning margins at the booth level important?

Analyzing margins at the booth level helps in understanding the intensity of the contest. It shows where the competition was neck-and-neck (Swing Booths) versus where one candidate won by a large, comfortable margin, providing insights into voter consolidation.